APPLY
for the program
HOST
a Scholar
CONNECT
with other Scholars
JOBS
for alums
Search:
Resources For:
CURRENT SCHOLARS
ALUMS
EDITORS
STUDENTS
Diversity
First Amendment Center
Newseum
Diaries about newsroom life and diversity
 

Rising above prejudice

By Sherry Parfait
1994 Scholar

Posted: May 13, 2003

"When Strom Thurmond ran for president, we voted for him. We’re proud of it. And if the rest of the country had followed our lead, we wouldn’t have had all these problems over all these years, either."

-- Sen. Trent Lott (R., Miss.), Dec. 5, 2002, at the 100th birthday celebration for Thurmond

Here’s what happened when I read Sen. Trent Lott’s now well-known comment that the country would have been better off had segregationist Strom Thurmond won the presidency in 1948:

First, I experienced disbelief. How could someone think -- let alone say -- something like that?

Then I felt like I had been slapped in the face. I felt insulted because I am a Republican voter. And I was sobered by the thought of such blatant racism in a public forum today, 55 years after Thurmond’s run for president. (Thurmond ran on the segregationist Dixiecrat ticket in 1948.)

I always considered racism to be something that affected people in faraway places. My parents attended "American Indian only" schools in the 1940s and ‘50s. But as a girl growing up on the bayous of southern Louisiana, I never directly experienced racial prejudice. At least not anything that was obvious.

I cannot say that Lott’s remarks indicate that he is racist. Only he and God know that.

Yet given his statement and the fact that he was forced to resign as Senate majority leader as a result, it is clear that racial prejudice still is alive. The stir his remarks caused -- the magazine covers, the talk shows, the reactions of leaders of both political parties to distance themselves from his comments -- confirms that the topic of race has yet to be fully addressed in our nation.

During my Chips Quinn internship in 1994 when I sat in congressional hearings on Capitol Hill, one phrase stood out above all others: "We have a moral obligation ..."

My interpretation of their "moral obligation" was that they recognized their responsibility to do what was in the best interest of their constituents.

As journalists, we have a moral obligation to report news that is in the best interest of our readers. And as ethnic Americans, we have a moral obligation to do what is in our nation’s best interest.

Lott’s remarks also remind journalists to consider the consequences before writing a news story.

Let us respond to racial prejudice in a way that reflects greater character than those who look down on us -- by loving and forgiving our enemies and promoting a spirit of unity in our communities.

May Trent Lott’s story help our nation be more united.

Sherry Parfait is completing a music-business degree at Middle Tennessee State University and working as a publicist and marketing consultant. She was a 1994 Scholar at Indian Country Today. Reach her at sherryparfaitprm@msn.com.

Back to Top

 
Gaining confidence
Studying column writing
Losing your mentor
 
An outline: Your roadmap
Localizing a story
Know your town