Why outline? To get you where you're
going By Dick Thien
Chips Quinn Writing Coach For the writer's
sake, it's a good idea to have an outline.
For the reader's sake, it's an even better idea.
When the word "outline" is mentioned, many writers think
of the kind that grade school and, sometimes, high school
teachers insisted on: Roman numerals and capital letters,
lower case letters and 1's, 2's and 3's, filling at least
two pages. Boring.
Well, that is not the sort of outline good writers use.
Instead, they jot down the main elements of their story,
putting them in the order that they think makes the most sense.
They try to be logical. Some pretend they are putting one
literary foot down at a time, marching toward a conclusion
that satisfies the reader.
If they get hung up -- what some writers call spaghettiing
-- they often realize that they have more reporting to do.
Or, they know they have to leave something out, especially
if the story bogs down when they read the first draft out
loud.
Those writers who fail to outline usually do just fine with
their lead, their nut graph and, often, with the first eight
paragraphs or so.
"I outline in my head," they say.
"I know you do," a frustrated editor says. "I've been reading
your stuff for three years."
Readers also can figure that out after getting to paragraph
nine. From there, most stories that come from an outline in
the head go nowhere and end nowhere. The outline-in-the-head
writer almost always ends with a quotation sandbagged from
the notebook to plop in the story when the spaghettiing starts.
That's not an ending, of course, but it ends the writer's
suffering.
"I don't care what you've heard, or what your literature
teacher said, or even what the writers themselves said," Jon
Franklin, a two-time Pulitzer Prize writer, says. "Every writer
of any merit at all during the last 500 years of English history
outlined virtually everything he wrote."
That is a strong observation with no proof offered other
than logic in his book, Writing for Story (Plume, 1994). Is
Franklin out there on that proverbial limb or do those three
words of any merit get him off the hook if he is challenged
about the value of an outline?
No.
The power of their prose, its logical flow and the structure
of their stories clearly show that Maya Angelou, Suzan-Lori
Parks, James Baldwin, Ralph Ellison and W.E.B. DuBois outlined.
Their writing is magical, and an outline was the wand that
made it so.
It turns out that they are joined by hundreds of good writers
who think the same thing, writers who outline their material
in the hope that they can move from being good to being excellent.
There are no rules for an outline. It can be three sentences
or 13 paragraphs. If a writer finds things in her notebook
that fail to fit in her outline, that's a strong hint that
the material doesn't belong in the story. A good outline contains
only the best that a writer has.
It is no coincidence that William Strunk Jr. and E.B. White
in The Elements of Style (Allyn & Bacon, 2000) have two
separate entries on outlining, the only repeat of a composition
principle in their 85-page masterpiece. They call the outline
design.
The first entry, "Choose a suitable design and hold to it,"
says:
"A basic structural design underlies every kind of writing.
Writers will in part follow this design, in part deviate from
it, according to their skills, their needs, and the unexpected
events that accompany the act of composition. Writing, to
be effective, must follow closely the thoughts of the writer,
but not necessarily in the order in which those thoughts occur.
This calls for a scheme of procedure. In some cases, the best
design is no design, as with a love letter, which is simply
an outpouring, or with a casual essay, which is a ramble.
But in most cases, planning must be a deliberate prelude to
writing. The first principle of composition, therefore, is
to forsee or determine the shape of what is to come and pursue
that shape.
"A sonnet is built on a 14-line frame, each line containing
five feet. Hence, sonneteers know exactly where they are headed,
although they may not know how to get there. Most forms of
composition are less clearly defined, more flexible, but all
have skeletons to which the writer will bring the flesh and
the blood. The more clearly the writer perceives the shape,
the better are the chances of success."
Strunk and White's second entry, "Work from a suitable design,"
reinforces their first entry this way:
"Before beginning to compose something, gauge the nature
and extent of the enterprise and work from a suitable design.
Design informs even the simplest structure, whether of brick
and steel or of prose. You raise a pup tent from one sort
of vision, a cathedral from another. This does not mean that
you must sit with a blueprint always in front of you, merely
that you had best anticipate what you are getting into. To
compose a laundry list, you can work directly from the pile
of soiled garments, ticking them off one by one. But to write
a biography, you will need at least a rough scheme; you cannot
plunge in blindly and start ticking off fact after fact about
your subject, lest you miss the forest for the trees and there
be no end to your labors.
"Sometimes, of course, impulse and emotion are more compelling
than design. If you are deeply troubled and are composing
a letter appealing for mercy or for love, you had best not
attempt to organize your emotions; the prose will have a better
chance if the emotions are left in disarray - which you'll
probably have to do anyway, since feelings do not usually
lend themselves to rearrangement. But even the kind of writing
that is essentially adventurous and impetuous will on examination
be found to have a secret plan; Columbus didn't just sail,
he sailed west, and the New World took shape from this simple
and, we now think, sensible design."
You have nothing to lose, everything to gain and a roadmap
to get you there by outlining. As the Nike ad says: Just do
it.
About the column
Write It Right is updated regularly. Have a suggestion for
a future column, contact Dick
Thien.
Read Dick Thien's biography.
Back to Top |