APPLY
for the program
HOST
a Scholar
CONNECT
with other Scholars
JOBS
for alums
Search:
Resources For:
CURRENT SCHOLARS
ALUMS
EDITORS
STUDENTS


Diversity
First Amendment Center
Newseum
Answers to your journalism questions
 

Print this document          Email this document

Can anecdotal leads be over done?

Related story
Formula leads: a cliché

Dear Coach,

I'm falling into the habit of writing nothing but anecdotal leads. I'm not the only one. Our news pages are full of stories written by writers forever stretching their legs out under roll-top desks, surveying lush gardens and other trivial activities. What's going on? --Habitual Hannah

Dear Habit,

We call them anecdotal leads. But often, they are not technically anecdotes -- just weak descriptions of non-activities that only succeed at irritating readers. They can often serve to mask other problems, like not having a clear story focus.

Sit down and ask yourself: Do I use a narrative, anecdotal or otherwise delayed lead only when it is vital to the story? What role does the lead play in the story as a whole? How does it illustrate what the story's really about?

If any of your answers is, "Well, gee, I don't know if it ... like, you know," then get rid of the lead.

If the lead includes children scampering nearby, underfoot or anywhere else, get rid of it. Scampering children usually signify that it is a wash-'n'-wear lead that could go on any story that has to do with people.

What is the story about? If you can answer that before you write, then the lead (and the story) won't be pointless.

About the column
Ask the Coach is updated regularly. Have a suggestion for a future column, contact Mary Ann Hogan.

Read Mary Ann Hogan's biography.

Back to top

 



Last updated: Thursday, April 24, 2014 | 09:31:53